Part 1: Post your opinion about cloning. You must include which type of cloning you are for AND against: theraputic or reproductive. You must also include why. It must be a well thought out answer.
Part 2: Argue or support someone else's opinion. You must state who you are supporting or arguing against and why. It must be a well thought out answer.
Make sure you include your first name and bell in your post.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
My opinion about cloning is that I accept cloning research so long as it is use for theraputic cloning. This means that stems cells or embronic cells are used to help trest genetic disorders such as cancer, diabeties, down syndrome, or to even create new organs for those on the organ donor lists. However, I do no support the idea of using cloning for reproductive reasons. In other words, I do not think that cloning should be used to create more humans, or more animals, even if creating more animals would be more food for people in the world. Mother nature has a delicate balance and I know it was created that way for a reason. What is your opinion?
ReplyDeletecloning in my opinion should be used theraputically. I think that way because if we clone other species they would be weak and we would have even more problems. Like down syndrome or diabeties. We need to worry about the real people not clones. People are dieing because they are on a waiting list for hearts and kidneys. If we take any longer those people would die because of the fantasy of cloning people and animals. Even though if we cloned a cow that would help the hunger of people but would there be something wrong with that food. Something wrong with the genetic make up??
ReplyDeletei agree with ms.dizon. i accept cloning research if its used for theraputic cloning, because i think that its important to help test genetic disorders such as cancer, diabeties, and down syndrome because those diseases hurt a lot of families, but i dont think its right to clone animals just for food because thats not fair for the animals that they get to be born just so they can get eaten.
ReplyDelete-COURTNEY LAMB(:
My opinion about cloning is pretty much the same as Ms. Dizon. I think that cloning is okay as long as its theraputic cloning. If it helps somewhat cure cancer, diabeties, and new organs then I accept it. I defintely don't accept reproductive cloning. Possibly killing humans to create MORE humans is wrong. I disagree with the cloning of animals too. Just like Dollie the sheep, many animals could die from being in the reproductive cloning. I think that it's very wrong.
ReplyDeleteSAMMi BECKMAN (:
PERiOD 1
My opinion about cloning is I think the theraputic cloning is okay. Just because it can help someone out that has a genetic disorder. I also think that cloning plants is fine but in cloning plants the farmers have to know the possiblilities of the plant surviving. I dont think that planning humans or sheep is okay because you can loose a life from something going wrong in the process. I agree with Sammi Beckman in what she had to say as well.
ReplyDeletePeriod 5
My opinion on cloning is pretty close to Ms. Dizons opinion. I am all for theraputic cloning because it helps people. Theraputic cloning helps people with cancer, diabetis, and down syndrome. The reason I disagree with animal cloning is because it can kill them just like Dollie. This is why is am for theraputic cloning and against reproductive cloning.
ReplyDeleteChloe Willis, (:
Period 5
My opinion about cloning is that I'm for it. Theraputic cloning I'm all for because it helps people. It's cool how they use it to try to cure many types of dieases to help them. Therautic cloning sounds like a good thing and I'm for it. I am totally against reproductive cloning though. I think it is a bad idea. I don't think it's a good idea that they want to clone animals and people. We all know what happened to Dolly the sheep and it would be horrible if it happened to humans or animals. It would be weird if tons of the same people were running around. It could possibly kill some humans and we don't want that. I totally agree with Samantha Beckman. She is right and it was well written. So as you can see I'm for theraputic cloning, but not for reproductive cloning.
ReplyDeleteMorgan Fuller:)
Period 5
To me cloning is wrong. It goes against my religion, and ruins the whole advantage af sexual reproduction, (diversety), however theraputic cloning i agree with, because it could save lives. So i agree with Mrs. Dizon.
ReplyDeleteMy opinion about cloning is that i like cloning because if i got in a car accident and lost a limb that i would like them to clone me an new limb
ReplyDeleteben clark period 5
I don't like the idea of reproductive cloning. I think that's wrong, it's creating the exact copy of someone else, then the world would be basically perfect. It isn't right to think that and only want another human being exactly like you. However, I do believe in theraputic cloning. That way, if anyone needs a kidney transplant there are available ones. It wouldn't hurt anyone. On the other hand, reproductive cloning uses risks, so you could make more humans, but you'd probably kill more humans than the ones you make more of. I also disagree with cloning animals. It's wrong and no one should be put through that. What's going on now is for a reason. I do agree with stem cell research, it doesn't bother me at all. That is my opinion about cloning.
ReplyDeletei agree with cloning as long as it is used for therapudic thow. i beleive that we dont need cloning of ppl and beings because i just think it is not right. i think this is because everyone was made differnet and no one should be exactly the same. i think it should be used only for tharapudic needs because it can help them walk again and bring a part of there body back to life. I also am with it because it can help cure diabetees and other disorders. i think there is no reason why there should be clones of beings.
ReplyDeleteShawn McKee
Bell 5
I only accept Theraputic cloning because that can help people. I do not accept reproductive cloning that can kill more people than it makes. Why would we need a clone of a person we already have one of that living creature. It can hurt the clones to it could have negative affects on the clone. Why would you clone something if it hurts it. Dolly had negative affects to being a baby but having a adult stem cells, so she was a sheep in a lamb's body. Theraputic cloning helps people with genitic disorders and it uses stem cells but doesn't create new organisms. All the animals that have to help to make the clone could die if the organisms fail, and that is not fair to them. If you was a animal how would you feel if you had to help create a clone, and you had a chance to die. This is my opinion on cloning.
ReplyDeleteMy opinion about cloning is that i agree with theraputic cloning but not reproductive cloning. I agree with theraputic cloning because it is helping people get better and live a longer and healthier life. I don't agree with reproductive cloning with humans. I don't think it's right to take away lives of humans to make more humans which might have something wrong with them anyways. That would be taking away a live of an innocent person to make another person that might not even turn out right. I think cloning pigs is okay too because it is helping humans get better and it's better than just eating them. This is my opinion on cloning.
ReplyDeleteMy opion about cloning is pretty much the same as Mrs.Dizon. I think cloning is okay as long as you don't do theraputic cloning. Also as long as you do not kill or heart any animals/humans. We should not clon TO many of you self
ReplyDeleteTHAT IS WHAT I THINK
I am for both reproductive and theraputic cloning. Reproductive cloning could solve our problems like world hunger by cloning livstock. Also the more we expieriment with cloning we will get better and have less errors. I also support theraputic cloning because this will give victims of accidents or soldiers a chance to live.
ReplyDeletemy opinion about cloning is that theraputic cloning is good to do.mostly because is helps people get organs if they have a genetic disorder.i think it is also good if someone have a spinal problem an can not walk.and it seems to work.like the rat in the movie and how it couldent walk and now it can.that is why i think theraputic cloning is better that reproductive.
ReplyDeletei am for therapudic cloning becaue it can help a ot of people with mising limbs or a diesese but i am against reproductive atleast until they perfect it because now they have a lot of side affects like arthritis and another example of a side effect is they die earlier htey hace a shorter life span also the army could clone a bunch of people and do somethng wierd like try to take over the world but i am sort of for it to because if you wanted to have a really hndsome baby you could chose to have blue eyes and blond hair or what ever you wanted i disagree with courney lambs logic for reproductive because a lot of animals are born just to be killed for food anyway so there really is not any different if they are cloned or not
ReplyDeleteMy view on cloning is that it can be okay to use reproductive and therapudic under certain circumstances.I don't agree with sammi and courtney. If we don't kill some animals then we can't research and see if we can prevent or cure diseases. I do think it is wrong to intentually kill animals ,but if you need to expirement it is fine. I don't think cloning humans is okay at all though. I think it is fine to clone animals on some occasions. Theraputic cloning is very good and helps a lot of people. Also, I think cloning is an educational and helpful way to possibly save the future!!!!:)
ReplyDeleteI agree with cloning because it helps humans in many ways.Like people need a heart they make a clone for them.Or if the population goes down in food we can clone cows and other meat animals and get out of starvation. I agree with therapedic cloning because it helps humans.I agree with Maria opinion because I don't think that it is right to clone and individual.
ReplyDeleteMy view on cloning therapudic is ok because it would help some one with missing lims get new ones. But I also think that it is wrong. It is wrong because there could be something wrong with that person that you are cloning and it wouldn't show up on anything and that person could end up with it also. It can be good because it can be very helpful for therpy and other stuff. I agree with Erica Olden because she is for therapudic and agenst reproductive. It can be good because you can help with diseases.
ReplyDeleteLORI SCHMITT
My view on cloning is that therapudic cloning is ok because it helps with disease and replacing body parts. I disagree on cloning humans for reproductive cloning. THe reason being is because of how many unborn egg cells would be killed. I do think that cloning can be helpful with therapy though. I agree with Lori Schmitt because therapudic cloning can be good with replacing parts and helping with diseases. I also agree with her because reproductive cloning is wrong. It is also wrong because it kills unborn children and can be successful but fatal at the same time:):):)
ReplyDeleteMy opinion on cloning is that it is religiously and ethicaly wrong. My religion is against both types of cloning. In reproductive cloning, it is wrong to take a future little baby and do scientific tests on it and it 99% of the time will die. In therapudic cloning, if someone is about to pass on, then people should not try to be God and save them. Everyone is going to die eventually. I agree and disagree with Mrs. Dizon's opinion. I do agree that reproductive cloning is wrong but I disagree with therapudic cloning. That is why I think cloning is wrong.
ReplyDelete- Sydney
My opinion about cloning is that I would perfer it only if it is theraputic cloning. My reason for this is that theraputic cloning can change the lives of many people by curing diseases such as cancer and diabetes. Also, we can give the people dying of a bad organ new organs, so they can live a long better life. Reproductive cloning, though, is a terrible thing to do(in my opinion). Because cloning animals and killing them for food kills so many of them. Its bad enough now that we have to survive off them, but we have to, and killing so many more is unfair and unjust. So, I disagree with Ben Geraci's opinion about agreeing with reproductive clonig!
ReplyDeleteI am for therapudic cloning because it could possibly save lives of people who are dying and need a transplant. I agree with what Shelby said about therapudic cloning. However, I am against reproductive cloning because I don't think it would help animals because the cloned animals would probably die in a short period of time anyway. I agree with what Lyndsey said about reproductive cloning. That is what I think about cloning.
ReplyDeleteI am pro cloning. I think that cloning is a very helpfull method of therapy.I believe therapedic cloning is more helpfull than reproductive cloning. I believe reproduuctive cloning is wrong, but it does have good intentions.I disagree with shelby thomas, because when your using the embryotic stem cells, they were never intendid to be a human life. This is why i believe it is fine to clone humans.
ReplyDeleteMy opinion on cloning is that I think theraputic cloning is helpful and it should be used. It helps people with disorders such as diabetes and it can help people who need new organs. But I don't like reproductive cloning. It wouldn't be right to have more of the same person and not have more of everyone. For example if I were to clone myself and have two of me, it would not be right to not have two of everyone else. It is also wrong to kill a child before it has a chance to be born just to make a clone of something.
ReplyDeleteI disagree with Shelby Thomas because it is very wrong to put animals through what Dolly went through. Even though they are animals, they still feel pain. I just think it is wrong to use reproductive cloning.
I love cloning that is therapudic. It helps out so many people from all different kinds of genetic disorders. A big one now is Cancer. Tons of people are dying because of it and researchers are trying to find a reason to help. This might be one way to help stop cancer. Also seven people die every day from waiting on the waiting list for new organs. It would save so many people if we just got atleast one more organ a day. I am totally against with everything i have with reproductive cloning. It hurts to many animals and humans and i am a total animal person. We dont need different humans in the world. Its meant for everyone to be different. We dont need it to be perfect. It would be a boring life. I totally agree with Mrs. Dizon. She is totally up for helping people out with therapudic but against reproductive.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with what Mrs. Dizon said, and not because she is the teacher :D. My opinion is that theraputic could help keep are population in balance. People with cancer, diabetes and other life threating problems could be helped with this type of cloning. It could provide new organs for people whos have failed due to kidney failure etc. I disagree with shelby thomas, killing animals isnt okay. I mean i understand that they need to do it to research to cure diseases but animals are not very different from humans. I also disagree with reproductive cloning because it is wrong to use potential lives to create other ones. It takes more lives to make a clone than the clone its self! Including the fact that they have health problems. BYE!
ReplyDeleteI am in the middle about cloning. I think that we should clone peoples body parts but I don't think we should clone people. I an for theriputic but against reproductive. Since it took 176 embriotic cells just to make Dolly then it might even take more trys to make a human. I strongly agree with Courtney and here oppinion with trying to find a cure for canser and about cloning animals because it really isn't the animals falt
ReplyDeleteI am in the middle about cloning. I think that we should clone peoples body parts and people too. I am for theriputic and reproductive. It did take 176 to make Dolly tries Kelly,but if you think about it;if the USA could make clones and make more army men and women we would not have to worry about people getting kill that are willing to give up there lives for our coutriy.
ReplyDeleteThat is what I think about cloning.
my opinion about cloning is you should clone because if you lose a pet or something you can take the DNA and freeze it and when the pet dies you can unfreeze the DNA and have them clone the pet. Therapudic ithink is the best for people missing limbs, diseaes, and any other health problems. I agree with Dietz because if we go out of starvation we can just clone the cows and chickens for food.
ReplyDeleteMy opinion about cloning is that we should use it for therapeutic reasons because we never have enough organs and people are dying. I do not agree with reproductive cloning because it takes many tries to get just one clone so many other organisms are dying. I agree with Morgan because Dolly did die unusually young for a sheep. It took so many tries and caused two hundred and some thing sheep to die. Yeah we could use it for food but I mean if there was something wrong with that animal and we cloned it then it could harm humans. But if we used therapeutic cloning then we could help humans. I am all for therapeutic cloning:)
ReplyDelete-ALLIE HALL:)
PERIOD 8
My opinion is pretty much the same as Ms. Dizon's. Theraputic cloning is perfectly fine with me. Many people die waiting for new organs and it would be so much easier to create new organs for the people with genetic disorders, so they can live. Although, I am totally against reproductive cloning. Like what Tara Nastoff said, it takes more lives to make a clone than the actual clone itself. I think it is wrong to hurt all the other animals and/or humans in which you are cloning, just to get that one clone. Like Dolly, it took 277 tries to make Dolly and during that process all the other sheep got hurt, and I think that is just wrong.
ReplyDelete-Chaney Steimel.
I agree with both Ms.Dizon and Erica Olden because I think theraputic is fine with helping to save lives and shortening organ waiting lists. I disagree with reproductive cloning because like Brandon it is against my religon because God created each of us in his own image but if we clone someone then that is not in his own image for that person, scientists should not have the right like God to created human beings or destroy them by abortion because that is mostly the girls own falt and it's murder.
ReplyDeleteHannah Taske:]
Bell 8
Personally I disagree with reproductive and therapeutic cloning. Even though therapeutic cloning may save someone's life I don't think it is right to use an embryo that would have been a human being. I'm a Christian person and I think that creating life should be left to God. That is just my opinion. You don't know what God may have intended for that embryo that you killed just to make a new organ for someone else. Because of my religion I think that we aren't supposed to have the power to make new people or animals. That is why I'm against reproductive cloning. If there was a way to do therapeutic cloning without killing an embryo I would be all for it. I think things like this just shouldn't be messed with. In my opinion scientists take things one step too far sometimes.
ReplyDeleteI disagree with Luke Hannon because he says that the embryos weren't meant to live, but we don't know that. We have no way of knowing what they were meant for. Only God can make that decision.
My opinion on cloning is that as long as cloning has its certain reasons on why someone is going to clone an organism it can be okay. In theraputic reasons, we should absolutely be able to have organs and ways to cure people who have these disablilites that effect their everyday life. In reproductive reasons I say that if we ever come up with a way that doesn't hurt/kill the organism in any way possible, then we should be able to clone it. We should be able to clone cows and pigs for food. No, we shouldn't just go clone animals to see what will happen, clone when necessary. To experiment for reproductive cloning, we could have a farmer donate animals. If we have the organism, why couldn't we experiment? However, I do believe it's just wrong to clone a human. Maybe we could clone a human if they wanted to be cloned, but I highly doubt anyone would want to put their life on the line like that. I agree with Shelby Thomas because sometimes we might have to clone animals on some occasions. Maybe if we have little food and only a few cows for food. People are going to have to experiment on the animals anyway. We should clone when necessary though.
ReplyDeletei disagree with tommy peacock because he is for reproductive cloning. i think reproductive cloning shouldnt be allowed because its wrong and it kills people and animals.
ReplyDeletei think theraputic is the best, because this can help with health problems which is a big deal at this point because there are many people now who have cancer, down syndrome, and diabeties.There are many others that people are suffering with too.I think that reproductive is not a good idea cloning animals is a good source of food but what if you clone a animal who can get sick easily and you have a herd of animals who are always getting sick.I agree with Ms.Dizon.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Sammi Beckman. She makes the point that when you try to clone a person then you would be trying to make more people but during the process you could go through many people until you get one clone. Also as Maria Harris stated scientist are trying to create a perfect world when its not natural. Theraputic cloning is the only way my opinion goes towards.
ReplyDeleteMy opinion on cloning is it is okay as long as it is theraputic cloning. I think that reproductive cloning is bad because you have to kill alot of things to get what you are cloning for. I think that theraputic cloning is alright because there are alot of people out there on a waiting list for a certain body part and therapetic cloning could help. I agree with Drew Chase because I think that reproductive cloning is hurting more than it is helping people and animals and theraputic cloning helps people and things with genetic or other disorders
ReplyDeleteMy opinion for cloning is theraputic cloning I think would be appropriate because it would probably save a lot of lives. Reproductive cloning I think would just change things to much and why would you want to look at a younger version of yourself all day if you had a clone ?? For part 2 I'm supporting Tara about the killing animals, thats just wrong ? what if they killed us just for research ? I'm pretty sure no one wants to live running away from animals...considering their everywhere ! cyaa. :D
ReplyDeletemy opinion on cloning is i am against repoductive cloning. i think it is wrong to kill a hundred animals to make one. You would take the life of many to givee live to one and that one could only live half their life. Reproductive is ok when creating fruits or vegetables to help other people. i think therepudic is ok to creeate new body parts to save other people.i agree with lori in her opinion about theripudic. it is ok when your msking new orgens for other people. i ddis agree with her on the dises becuase if special care is taken dieses shouldnt be passed down.
ReplyDeletei disagree wih tommy because in my opinion reproductive cloning is wrong because its not worth killing animals and humans for MOREE of them, that doesnt really make sense to do that. so thats why i disagree with him.
ReplyDelete-COURTNEY LAMB(:
My opinion on cloning is that I think it is wrong to clone humans, but testing cloning on animals is ok and actually cloning plants is a good thing but cloning a human is extremly wrong. I think it is extremly wrong because when you clone a human, that human is the exact copy of the human you cloned. This takes away the meaning of individual and unique. What I mean is if you were cloned you are not unique in your own way like a true human. But since plants dont have feelings and we usually need food, why not clone plants? I disagree with Eva becuase if we want to know the effects of cloning, it is absoutley neccessary to clone animals. I seriously doubt a human would want to be cloned. Who else do we have to test it on? We have to clone certain animals because if something went wrong with a human if we cloned him/her, the effect could be extremly painful. We must know the effects of cloning before we test cloning on humans, which in my opinion, is not right. That is why we must clone animals.
ReplyDeleteMy opinion on cloning is that theriputic cloning is acceptable because they can help heal people that need orgin transplants and this would make it so there was enough hearts and kidneys and stuff like that. I think that reproductive cloning would be good for vegetable and food for people but for people it would be bad because for embryotic cloning, people may have to die for the cause.
ReplyDeleteI disagree with Maria Harris about the reproductive cloning because the farmers can use it to create more crops and feed more people in the world that are starving. Maria says that she is totally against reproductive cloning but Im just against doing it to animals. Plants may be good though.
SHELBYLYNNRILEY8),said,
ReplyDeletei really don't agree with either reproductive or theraputic cloning because;repooductive is just creating humans or animals and not really letting them live to make one clone. I disagree with theraputic because yeah I know it would help someone live that has a disability but its still killing someone or not letting them have the chance to live. If I had to choose one I would agree with Mrs.Dizon' s about theraputic becasue of the disability's and diseases.
-:)
my opinion on cloning is that it is wrong to clone people but animals are okay because we eat them and stuff. I also think cloning organs is good because they can one day save peoples lives. I disagree with sammi beckman because cloning animal can provide food for the homeless. :)
ReplyDeleteMy opinion on coloing is that it should not be used at all. But, it feels as of sometimes it could be okay to use theraputic coloing. Because it's against my reglion but, it could also be used for good. Like it can help people whth cancer and stuff. I agree in Sydney's oponion in which states that it's ethically wrong. But on the other hand Illana said it's okay.
ReplyDeleteI Only agree with theraputic cloning because it can help people that have bad organs, i dont agree with reproductive cloning because there is a very good chance that the clone will not live long like Dolly the sheep. Another reason i disaree with reproductive cloning is that the clone will probably get treated a lot different by getting treated like a pet.
ReplyDeleteI disagree with tommy peacock on cloning with reproductive because the scientist could try to clone food but there is probably a very good chance that the food will have a down side on tthe food and the animal.
i agree with Sammi theraputic cloning is ok. because some people are dieing from being on the the waiting list for kidnies and other organs. it wouldnt hurt to try theriputic cloning.
ReplyDeletei disagree with tommy because reproductive cloning can kill lots of people. just like how many trys it took to get dolly. why would you use reproductive cloning to make more people if your just going to kill them in the processes of cloing them.
Destany said,
ReplyDeleteMy opinion about cloning is that reproductive is wrong and im for theraputic. Reproductive you had to kill 277 to make one sheep and she only lived to half her age. And theraputic can other people with organs and other things they need to survive.
I think that cloning is boring.
ReplyDeleteI don't agree with ms.dizon
Ashley said, (:
ReplyDeleteHonestly, i agree with theraputic cloning beacause if I was somebody with a disability i would want something to cure me. But if it damages anybody else in the process, just so something can cure me, I disagree with it. I think reproductive is wrong because killing hundreds of innocent animals to make one clone is not wort it in my opinion. But, if scientists came up with a way to clone animals without killing hundredss or even a few in the process then I would be 100% for it. In the future I think we are going to need to clone animals for food but cloning animals for any other reason is wrong.
I agree with Shelby Thomas and Eva because it's so necessary for people to clone animals for food. But we don't need to clone animals not for food. If scientists just want to see if they can do it, then it is def. wrong. I disagree with Tommy because reproductive cloning is wrong. It kills animals for no reason, well so far for no reason.
In my opinion I am for theraputic cloning because there are tons of people on a list waiting for hearts and other organs people die every day because of heart failure and some have been on the list for too long. If we find a way to clone hearts then alot less people would die. I disagree with Mr.Peacock because for example over two hundred sheep died in order to make dolly. If people start cloning other people imagine how many people would die in order to make a clone.I think reproductive cloning is wrong and we should stop before it gets out of controll. 1st bell
ReplyDeleteDestany said,
ReplyDeleteMy opinion about cloning is that reproductive is wrong and im for theraputic. Reproductive you had to kill 277 to make one sheep and she only lived to half her age. And theraputic can other people with organs and other things they need to survive.
I agree with Sammi beckman and Erica olden. With sammi because i dont think e should have reproductive and with erica because im for theraputic
My opinion about cloning is that I think it is wrong. I beleive that both types of cloning theraputic and reproductive cloning are very wrong. What is the point of getting someone something new like a kidney or something if there are going to be side effects anyway?? But if i had to choose one i would probally go for theraputic cloning. Plus what is the point of using alot of money for one clone that is not even going to last that long it makes no sense!!!!! I am not saying that I a huge religious person or anything but, I agree with mant preists that it is going against god's will and we will pay for it. Scientist just need to be less experimantal with cloning and stick to the normal things like hydro electric cars or something. I dont know about you but I dont want to be cloned. I want to be unique and my own self. Well I hope you enjoyed my comment and thought about what I said!!!!!
ReplyDeleteMy opinion about cloning is that I think it is wrong. I beleive that both types of cloning theraputic and reproductive cloning are very wrong. What is the point of giving someone something new like a kidney or something if there are going to be side effects anyway?? But if I had to choose one I would probally go for theraputic cloning. Plus what is the point using alot of money for one clone that is not even going to last that long it makes no sense to me at all!!!!! I am not saying that I am a huge religious person or anything but, I agree with many preists, it is going againsts god's will and we will pay for it. Scientist just need to be less experimental with cloning and stick to the normal things like hydro electric cars or somethhing. I dont know about you but I dont want to be cloned. I want to be unique and my own self.
ReplyDeleteI also agree with Dana Johnson. Theraputic cloning should be used on some circumstances but only for critical emergencies. There maybe alot of people on a waiting list but you have to think about how much money it will cost and how many people will get hurt by doing theraputic and reproductive cloning. There will be alot at risk and even if you do get a theraputic clone you are still at risk. So either way you and many others will get hurt. So there is something you can think about. Well I hope you enjoyed my comment but it is all up to you now.
I agree with Morgan Fuller. I believe theraputic cloning is ok because it is to help people with serious dieseases like cancer, diabeates, and down syndrome. I am totally against reproductive cloning because I think it is wrong to put an animals life in danger like that if you don't already know that they will survive. I think what happened to dolly was very very wrong. So as you can see I am for theraputic cloning and against reproductive.
ReplyDeleteChloe Willis, (:
I agree with cody cole about using tharapudic cloning. i think this becuse it can help ppl with genetic disorders. also it can help people who have been paralized can do stem cell stuff and get there legs back. i disagree with reproductive cloning because i dont think we need an exact clone of someone and i dont think its right. because we are who we are and theres no reason to have someone exactly like you. Except for twining that comes naturally but when you use science and artficaially do it its not right
ReplyDeleteI disagree with sydney minnich completely because we need to work on this technology to advance our technolgy and become better at what we do even if that means going against certain religions and ethics.
ReplyDeletei am aginst reproductive cloning but not aginst therepudic.I am aginst reproductive cloning because in my opinion cloning a live organism is morbile wrong.I am for therepudic because if i ever get hurt and need a body part i would push for therepudic cloning because i wouldnt want to not push for something that could make me better.
ReplyDeletei do not agree with jordan graham because i dont think that it is wrong for therepudic cloning because what if u got ur leg amputated or needed a hart trans plant wouldnt u rather have a cloned hart than to just give up and die!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I agree with Jimmy Meyer because i think that tharapudic cloning i a very good thing...because if someone needs an organ somebody with genetic disorder couldn't gave them their organ but if they have therapudic cloning that stops genetic disorders also it helps prevent it so then you could donate your organ...also if your paralized you can give them a hole nother spine so they can walk again so thts why i think cloning is good and why i agree with jimmy.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Zack Lane about theraputic cloning because it doesn't hurt hurt anyone.I thing is is cool how it can make cripples get new new back bones
ReplyDeleteand they can walk again. Also i like how people get hearts too. I thing reproduction is wrong because of the mutations that can go wrong.That is why i thing theraputic is better than reproduction.
I agree with Ashley because if something was wrong with me were theraputic cloning could help me i would be very happy. I agree that if it could hurt somebody to cure me they souldn't do it. This is my reasons to agree with Ashley
ReplyDeleteMy opinion about cloning is thats reproductive cloning is wrong and theraputic is fine.i think reproductive is wrong because i dont like how the people cloned dolly and 277 sheep died. Just think what it would be like for 277 children to die. I agree with jimmy meyer because he thinks theraputic is fine and reproduction is wrong.
ReplyDeleteMy opinion on cloning is that theraputic is ok. I think theraputic cloning is safer than reproductive cloning. Theraputic cloning can save people's lives. In theraputic cloning, people clone organs from the human body. If someone clones organs like livers, kidneys, etc., it can save some people fom having to donate their organs. I also say that reproductive cloning can be dangerous. Like with Dolly, scientists had to use 277 sheep to make Dolly. We can't use 277 or more humans to make 1 clone. I agree with Ms. Dizon on both theraputic and reproductive cloning. Ms. Dizon also agrees that theraputic cloning can be used to create new organs. She also disagrees with reproductive cloning. She says it's Mother Nature's job to make "clones". This is why I support theraputic cloning and not reproductive cloning.
ReplyDeleteMy opinion about cloning is that it is not good.I think reproductive is wrong because they had to kill
ReplyDeleteall those sheep Ican only imagine how many people they would have to kill:(. I like therapuric cloning
because you dont have to kill any of very little to test it thats my comment hope you enjoyed!!!!!
I do agree with Braydon because i also think it is wrong to clone a human because like he said, it takes away the uniqueness of humans, and it kills innocent people. I also think it is okay to clone plants, like braydon, because we do need food and it's not hurting anything to clone more food for people that need it.
ReplyDeleteLyndsey Schroder(: .!
Period 5
to be straight up i think cloning has its ups and downs. i think its good for theraputic because it allows organs to be made to help or even save lifes.i think reproductive is not right.i think it kills to many organisms or harm them.i think if people started getting clones of them self it wouldnt be good every thing would be the same.there would still be different personalites but i still think it would alimanate to much of our diversity that makes us ,us.scientiest cross to many boundries in some aspects of cloning but could help in a lot of ways too.if reproductive didnt kill so many organisms i would be for it but as of now they will way to much like 277 sheep to make dolly but yet they clone grapes and i think that is okay or otay as i say because that dosent harm any thing as we no of now.i agree with illana.theraputic makes organis.as well as can cure diabeties.it has less side afects than if the person didnt have the orgian.thats what i think about cloning :)
ReplyDeleteI think Cloning is good in some in cases. Like if someone gets in to a car wreck and need a spinal cord. I think we should be able to clone one for that person. I agree with Ben Clark. I don't think we should clone animals. I think we could clone plants. We could clone plants if we need more trees. We could also clone them if we don't want to kill more of the environment.
ReplyDeleteI think that reproductive cloning is wrong because it can be very dangorous for humans. I don't even think that cloning is right for animals or humans. Cloning can have very deadly side affects too. Humans should newer be cloned it is just WRONG. So that is why I do not think that cloning is wrong. But I do think that people should be allowed to clone parts of the body in case others need them. If someone was in an accident then they would probably need a transplant and there is not enough transplants for everyone so that is why we need cloneing for certain things.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Erica and Lori because it is wrong to clone humans. The baby would be in danger if they did that. But it would be right to clone parts for people that need them.
I agree with theraputic cloning. But I do NOT agree with reproductive cloning. Theraputic cloning could save many lives in the future. It could make the donor list smaller and create a an awesome cure for kidney/lung/heart failure. Theraputic cloning may have bad side effects but it could be replced again. My reasoning for not agreeing with reproductive cloning is it has very bad side effects. People who know how to do it could take advantage of the fact they can clone people with certin physical features. I agree with all the preists who protest against cloning.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Dana Johnson about her opinion of theraputic cloning.
i dont agree with reprouctive cloning i personaly think its rong because we tried more than twohundered times to make dolly why would we put humans throught that.i agree with drew chase.i think that theriputic cloning it will help people
ReplyDeleteI agree with jordan because i like to have cloning in our every thing like plants, animals,and food
ReplyDeleteBen Clark Period 5
I think that cloning is good sometimes but other times its bad. I think that reproductive is bad becuase they kill alot of animals and stuff while doing it but it is good because you can clone plants and that would make us have more food so thats good. I think that the other one is good because it lets you copy organs that help people live so thats good
ReplyDeleteI think cloning is good but only theraputic because it can save peoples lives and i think it is less risky than reproductive cloning. I have mixed thoughts of reproductive because it can be good by cloning plants. But when you try to clone a human you destroy humans that are not born yet and it may take many tries to clone them right.
ReplyDeleteI support cheyenne. I think this because she thinks that it is wrong to clone people and animals too.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Jordan Shelby Tipton that cloning is good in some cases like he said that if someone got in a wreck we should be able to clone for him.
ReplyDeleteI agree with what Ms. Dizon said. I think that theraputic cloning is okay because it can help save peoples lives. It can make the donor list smaller and create cures for kidney, lung, and heart faliure. I do NOT agree with reproductive cloning. I think that farmers cloning plants is okay but the farmers need to know what could happen to the plants by doing this. I think colning people and animals is not okay and could cause them to die at a young age. I agree with what Staci has to say.
ReplyDeleteI agree whith theraputic cloning because if I needed an organ and I couldnt get it theraputic cloning could help me. Reproductive cloning is wrong because it kills a lot of animals. I disagree with Shelby Thomas because it is wrong to kill animals.
ReplyDeleteZach Burnett, Period 8
I agree with Lyndsey Shcroder about being for theraputic but not for reproductive. I think reproductive cloning is wrong because it can kill animals and people. It took 277 sheep to make Dolly. That is rediculous because those researchers killed 276 sheep just to get one "ok" sheep. That is so wrong on so many levels. We would never ever do that to a human. It would be torture for them. They would have so many things wrong with them and then they would most likely die very quickly. Its horrible. Im glad they will not try that on humans ever, i mean, i hate that they do it on animals and i want them to stop because it is not nesseccary. However, I do agree with theraputic because someday, someone could get in a really bad accident or something and loose some of their limbs. And theraputic cloning can make the limbs again for people so they can live again. And be normal like they used to be. It could change a persons life SO much, in a really good way i mean. So i do not agree with reproductive, I do agree with theraputic cloning though. That is alright with me if it helps people and saves there life. I am all for that! :D
ReplyDeletei think that both cloning is good because with theraputic cloning is good for people that have to have a transplant immediately but have no donor for them. It could save their life. Reproductive cloning is also good because if we clone the main animals and plants that we eat then he could help save places that are starving and do not have the same food as us, but not clone humans.
ReplyDeletei agree with Carolyn because it will make organs instead of harming animals or people. it is safer and many people will not have to worry about trying to find a donor if they already have their organs waiting.
My opinion about cloning is that reproductive cloning is wrong. I think it is ok to do therapeutic cloning because it is made to help cure diseases/disorders. Reproductive cloning is basically cloning just for fun. Most animals that have been cloned by reproductive cloning have died at an early age or from disease. It takes many tries to actually be successful in reproductive cloning, so it takes the lives of many animals. Therapeutic cloning is specifically used to cure diseases and to give spare organs or body parts. That is my opinion about cloning and how it should be used.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Tommy for disagreeing with Sydney about therapudic cloning because despite having religious beliefs, therapudic cloning could still save lives even though it could be religiously wrong.
ReplyDeleteI disagree with Ben Geraci's second comment because if we clone people that is just wrong. Plus, that is many egg cells that could have been living breathing people. If we do clone people and force them to be in the army we can't because the government doesn't have the power to force people to join the army. Anyways, the clones will have different feelings and beliefs than their clone because it's only their DNA that is the same. So that is my argument with Ben Geraci.
ReplyDeleteHannah Taske:]
Bell 8
I argee with drew because I dont think that it is right to clone a human bein.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Malea Arvin because I agree with theraputic cloning but not reproductive cloning. Theraputic cloning will save many lives in the future. I also agree that reproductive cloning has the worst and more side effects than theraputic does.
ReplyDeletei agree with theraputic cloning because it helps people but i disagree with reproductive cloning because its killing inocent animals. i agree with nick capella
ReplyDeleteI agree with lyndsey Schroder because she is kinda like mine and i agree with her that theraputic cloning is good but reproductive is bad. Ryan JOnEs
ReplyDeleteI agree with Allie and Clayton because cloning humans is wrong because it kills more people than it makes an we can just clone animals for food, and if we clone organs and stuff to save peoples lives
ReplyDeleteIn my opinion I only support theraputic cloning because it will help many people on the waiting list for a new organ or someone who cant walk.I disagree with reproductive cloning on humans, but not animals because making more animals can be good especially with endangered animals.
ReplyDeleteI disagree and agree with jordan graham because some cloning can be okay,such as theraputic but other cloning such as reproductive is wrong because i believe there is meant to be only one type of each peron in the world...ever. But other than that reproductive can be okay. Then theraputic is ok because would you rather die or have a new heart with a few difficulties her and there. I would rather have the heart of course but thats just me. And thats my opinion.
:) peace!
@>-%---
I disagree with Tommy Peacock. I think that with the technology that we have now, we have hurt the earth more then we helped it. We don't need to advance our technology in this field because we are trying to act like God. People should not be made in a petri dish. We are killing more people then we are helping with cloning. We would not be saving the human race by cloning. we would be hurting it! The reason why we have some of the problems now is because we created them with advances in technology. I am strongly against cloning.
ReplyDelete- Sydney
my opinion on cloning is that it is great that we have the technology to experiment with cloning, but it would be hard for an animal clone to live without any medical problems, and if an animal is going to have problems and you should help it live.
ReplyDeleteI disagree with jordan because i would not like to have cloning in our everyday thing like plants, animals, and food.
Paige Cornett Period 8
I disagree with Sydney because theraputic cloning could help people with diabetes and even people who need organs or limbs. I also agree with her because reproductive cloning is wrong. But with theraputic cloning, you can save tons of lives. There are a lot of people on a transplant list waiting for new organs, whose lives could depend on cloning. If they use cloning to give them new organs, they wouldn't have to depend on someone to die to donate organs. Even children that are born with missing limbs could be helped greatly by theraputic cloning.
ReplyDeleteI agree with theraputic cloning because it doesn't hurt the anything. I don't agree with reprodutive cloning because with dolly it took 176 tries. So reproductive cloning killed 176 embrotic cells.I agreee with Kellie about not cloning people.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Eva when she says how for theraputic we need organs to help people that ne transplants and stuff. i also agree with her when she says how in reproduction we need to use them for cloning animals for needs only and not just to see what happens.
ReplyDeleteI disagree with Anna because we should be able to cure someone with a disability. I mean, yeah it might be dangerous but we don't want someone on Earth to be in like, pain. Anna is just wrong. You just make copies to help the person. Would you rather have someone die when they can have a chance to live? It's not fair. Scientists and doctors know how to make that person live. We shouldn't take that chance away from them. If God didn't want people to have the technology to clone, then why do we still have technology?
ReplyDeleteI agree with Malea when she says that she agrees with all the priests who protest against cloning.
ReplyDeleteI disagree with Eva because she says that we should clone a human if they want to be cloned. Eva is completely wrong. I don't think that we should ever clone a person. When you think about it when you clone someone you are just cloning the body. Where does its soul come from? According to my religion God gives people souls. Cloning doesn't involve God at all. I just don't understand Eva's reasoning. Explain that Eva.
I agree with justice because there should be extra parts for humans the need oragins such as the people on the waiting list they should be the ones that get the parts first because they are on wait.I disagree with reproductive cloning because they should not make two of something such as an animal its not right they should have just 1 of that animal thats all no more than that.
ReplyDeleteI think that theraptic cloning and stem cell research is right because it could save many organisms lives. I think reprodctive cloning is wrong, especially with a human, because if we did do that, the organism cloned would no longer be an individual. No human in this world is exactly the same so if we did clone someone, that would be false then. I think cloning an animal or human is wrong because i believe God is sopose to create organisms or they are sopose to become in exsistence naturally. If an animal or human was cloned, they would not be one of God's children and not be one of God's creations.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Shawn Mckee and Barb Hoebbel. But I disagree with Shelby Thomas because, again, cloning an animal or human would not be natural and would not be one of God's creations. Also, alot of possible animals have to die before a clone of an animal is created.
i am for both reproductive and theraputic cloning
ReplyDeletei am for reproductive cloning because reproductive cloning could solve world hunger problems by cloning plants such as rice, corn, wheat, and maybe even live-stock.i am for theraputic cloning because i believe that every human should have a fighting chance to survive,and by cloning organs and/or other body parts they have a chance to live.
i agree with Tommy Peacocks thoughts on cloning because cloning could be a great and significant ally to humans wether it be now or the future.
A statement that i would like to make is that i do not and will never let religion get in the way of scientific discoveries because i believe that religion clouds judgement on controversial subjects such as cloning.
i thank you for your time and good day-Billy Browning